Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →
  1. All studies
  2. /Who owns America's nursing homes: a concentration story, 2026
FINANCIAL DISTRESS · ISSUE 080
cms-pecosOriginal Research

Who owns America's nursing homes: a concentration story, 2026

Of the 14,425 U.S. skilled nursing facilities in CMS's PECOS ownership file, only 28.1% are independent — owned by individuals or a single-facility entity. The other 71.9% disclose a multi-facility organization among their owners, and 52.3% belong to a group of 10 or more facilities.

BY FONTEUM RESEARCH BUREAU · JUNE 16, 2026 · 9 MIN READ · ASSERTED VIA SLSA L3REVIEWED BY DR. JENNIFER MONTECILLO, MDSNAPSHOT 2026-05-25 · DOI 10.5072/fonteum/nursing-home-ownership-concentration-2026 · LAST UPDATED JUNE 16, 2026
CMS PECOS · 2026-05-25
Reviewed by Dr. Jennifer Montecillo, MD, non-practicing medical reviewer. Gullas College of Medicine, 2019. Non-practicing medical reviewer focused on source interpretation, terminology, and limitations language. About our reviewers →
Reproduce this study →
U.S. nursing homes by size of their largest owner group, 2026cms-pecos · 2026-05-25
Individual / family owned
2232
Single-facility org
1824
2–9 facilities
2822
10–49 facilities
4648
50–99 facilities
1807
100+ facilities
1092
Built on CMS PECOS · snapshot 2026-05-25 · reproducible · re-derive the figures yourself
Key findings
71.9%
of the 14,425 skilled nursing facilities in CMS's PECOS All Owners file disclose at least one organization that also owns another facility — a multi-facility group. Only 28.1% are independent: 15.5% owned solely by individuals and 12.6% by an organization tied to no other facility
cms-pecos · CMS
52.3%
of all nursing homes — 7,547 facilities — belong to a group of 10 or more facilities. 1,807 (12.5%) sit in groups of 50 to 99 and 1,092 (7.6%) in groups of 100 or more. The single-facility independent is now the exception, not the rule
cms-pecos · CMS
63.1%
of the 46,832 facility–owner relationships on file are held by the largest 10% of organizational owners — 1,265 of 12,646 distinct owner organizations. The single most-disclosed organization appears as an owner of 249 facilities
cms-pecos · CMS
3.8
organizations are disclosed as owners of the average nursing home (median 2, maximum 99) — direct owners, indirect parents, holding companies, and operators stacked across the layers a single CMS-855A filing can carry
cms-pecos · CMS
280,207
owner rows across 14,425 SNF enrollments make up the published file, snapshot dated 2026-05-25. Every figure is a count over disclosed ownership and operational-control relationships — a structural measure only. No individual person is named, and no quality, conduct, or risk inference attaches to any organization
cms-pecos · CMS
On this page
Most nursing homes belong to a multi-facility groupThe concentration is top-heavyOwnership is layered, not flatThe independent quarter is individuals, not a data gapWhat one row actually isMethodologyLimitationsSources

CMS keeps a public ledger of who owns America's nursing homes. The PECOS Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners file, published monthly through the agency's data catalog under the Affordable Care Act's §6101 ownership-disclosure rule, lists every organization and individual disclosed as holding an ownership or operational interest in each Medicare- or Medicaid-certified skilled nursing facility. Read the current file and one fact dominates: the independent, single-home nursing facility — owned by the family that runs it — is now the exception. Most nursing homes belong to a group.

Most nursing homes belong to a multi-facility group

Of the 14,425 skilled nursing facilities in the file, 71.9% disclose at least one organization that also owns another facility — and only 28.1% are independent. Bucket every facility by the size of the largest group any of its organizational owners belongs to, and the distribution tilts hard toward scale.

Largest owner groupFacilitiesShare of file
Individual / family owned (no org owner)2,23215.5%
Single-facility organization1,82412.6%
2–9 facilities2,82219.6%
10–49 facilities4,64832.2%
50–99 facilities1,80712.5%
100+ facilities1,0927.6%

Source: CMS PECOS SNF All Owners, every SNF enrollment classified by its largest organizational owner's reach, snapshot 2026-05-25.

The two independent categories together — facilities owned only by individuals, and facilities whose single organizational owner appears nowhere else — account for 4,056 facilities, 28.1% of the file. Everything above them is a group. The largest single bucket is the 10-to-49-facility regional operator (32.2%), and 52.3% of all nursing homes belong to a group of 10 or more. A facility that is part of a 100-plus-facility organization (7.6%) is now more common than one owned by a single-facility company.

A disclosed ownership relationship is a structural fact, not a Fonteum judgment. It records that an organization holds an ownership or operational interest in a facility — and says nothing this study adds about the care delivered inside it.

The concentration is top-heavy

The largest 10% of organizational owners account for 63.1% of every facility–owner relationship on file. Rank all 12,646 distinct owner organizations by how many facilities they touch, and the top decile — 1,265 organizations — holds 29,550 of the 46,832 facility–owner links. The floor of that decile is an organization tied to 7 facilities; the single most-disclosed organization appears as an owner of 249.

Organization (disclosed owner / operator)SNF facilities
PACS Holdings, LLC249
PACS Group, Inc.248
The Ensign Group, Inc.233
Life Care Centers of America, Inc.194
HCCF Management Group XI LLC187
Gen Operations II LLC186
ZAC Properties XI LLC186
Gen Operations I LLC185
Genesis Healthcare LLC184
Genesis Healthcare, Inc.183

Source: CMS PECOS SNF All Owners, the ten organizations named on the most facility disclosures, deduped by owner PAC ID, snapshot 2026-05-25.

Two cautions make this table a floor on concentration, not a ceiling. First, CMS discloses each entity under its own owner PAC ID, and this study deduplicates by PAC ID rather than inferring corporate families — so affiliated entities within one company appear as separate rows. PACS Group, Inc. and PACS Holdings, LLC are disclosed separately; so are the several Genesis HealthCare operating entities. Resolving those families to a single beneficial owner would raise the per-company counts, never lower them. Second, the column counts disclosures, not control percentages: an organization may appear because it holds a 5% indirect interest or because it exercises operational control. The names here are organizations, the unit is a count, and no quality, conduct, or risk inference attaches to any of them.

Ownership is layered, not flat

The average nursing home discloses 3.8 organizations as owners; the median discloses 2, and the deepest discloses 99. A single skilled nursing facility rarely has one owner. The CMS-855A disclosure threads through direct owners, indirect parents, holding companies, property companies, and the operating company that runs the building day to day — each a separate disclosable organization.

That layering is why the simple question "who owns this nursing home?" has no single answer in the data, and why this study measures relationships rather than picking one owner per facility. The 46,832 facility–owner links across 12,193 facilities that disclose any organizational owner are the unit of concentration: a facility owned through a four-entity stack contributes four links, and the organization at the top of many such stacks is what the top-decile figure captures. The structure is a genuine feature of how nursing homes are held, not a quirk of the file.

The independent quarter is individuals, not a data gap

The 2,232 facilities that disclose no organizational owner at all are not missing data — they are owned and run by individuals. Among those facilities, 1,464 disclose an individual in operational or managerial control and 1,289 disclose an individual holding a 5%-or-greater direct ownership interest. These are the family- and individually-owned homes: the genuine independents, 15.5% of the national file. Add the 1,824 facilities whose only organizational owner is a single-facility company, and the independent share reaches 28.1% — a real and sizeable minority, but a minority all the same.

What one row actually is

Each row in snf_all_owners is one disclosed owner of one SNF enrollment: the owner's type (organization or individual), the role they hold, an association date, and — for organizations — a canonical owner PAC ID (associate_id_owner), which is the identifier this study deduplicates on rather than the free-text name. The companion snf_enrollments file carries one row per facility enrollment and the enrollment_id that joins the two. Counting and grouping these rows is the entire method here. The owner-to-entity-graph link is deferred, so ownership concentration renders on no individual provider profile. Every figure is a count at the facility, group, or organization level. No individual person is named, and the study makes no statement about the quality of care at any facility.

Methodology

All figures are direct aggregations over the snf_all_owners and snf_enrollments tables, populated from the CMS PECOS Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners public-use file (data.cms.gov, Provider Characteristics → Hospitals and Other Facilities). The owners table holds 280,207 owner rows across 14,425 SNF enrollments; snapshot date 2026-05-25; public, read-only; license US-Government-Works. The disclosure exists under the Affordable Care Act §6101 and 42 CFR §424.516, filed on form CMS-855A.

An organizational owner is a row with type_owner = 'O' and a role code in the ownership or operational-control set: 5%-or-greater direct (34) and indirect (35) ownership interest, other direct (85) and indirect (86) ownership interest, general (38) and limited (39) partnership interest, and operational/managerial control (43). The study deliberately excludes Additional Disclosable Parties (role 72 — accounting firms, banks, consultants), mortgage and security-interest holders (36, 37), corporate officers and directors (40, 41), managing employees and governing-body members (42, 25, 63), and trustees (71): parties CMS discloses but that are not owners or operators of the facility. Owner organizations are deduplicated by canonical PAC ID, never by name, because a single organization is disclosed under many name spellings. A facility's largest owner reach is the maximum number of facilities touched by any of its organizational owners; that value classifies the facility and drives the group-size buckets. Because these are counts and ratios over a published file, every figure is exact as of the snapshot rather than estimated. Methodology version: cms-snf-all-owners/v1. The source-provenance contract is documented in the provenance methodology.

Limitations

  • A structural ownership measure, not a quality or conduct signal. Every figure counts disclosed ownership and operational relationships. It is unrelated to staffing, inspection findings, penalties, or any assessment of care, and naming an organization here is not a statement about its conduct. This study draws no such inference about any facility or owner.
  • Aggregate and organization-level only. Figures are counts at the facility, group, or organization level. No individual person is named, and the owner-to-entity-graph link is deferred, so ownership concentration renders on no provider profile.
  • PAC-ID dedup understates corporate-family concentration. Affiliated entities within one company are disclosed under separate PAC IDs and counted separately. The per-organization figures are therefore a floor; resolving beneficial owners would raise concentration, not lower it.
  • Layering inflates raw owner counts, by design. A facility held through a multi-entity stack discloses each entity separately. The mean of 3.8 organizations per facility describes disclosure depth, not the number of independent parties with effective control.
  • Snapshot, not a trend. Figures reflect the single file dated 2026-05-25. CMS refreshes the list monthly; indirect-ownership reporting in particular was sparse before October 2024, so historical comparisons are not drawn here.
  • Disclosure completeness varies. The analysis takes CMS's disclosed roles as filed. A small number of facilities may under- or over-report owners relative to their true structure; the study counts what is on the record.

Sources

  • CMS — PECOS Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners — the monthly public-use file behind every figure in this study.
  • CMS — Ordering, certifying & enrolling: providers and suppliers — the Medicare enrollment program (PECOS) under which a facility files its ownership disclosure.
  • 42 CFR §424.516 — Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling — the disclosure rule, enacted under Affordable Care Act §6101, that requires SNFs to report their owners.

The companion SNF All Owners data explorer exposes the underlying records, and the PECOS enrollment dataset page covers the enrollment side of the same source. This is the ownership mirror of where nursing-home penalties concentrate and of the facilities reporting zero registered-nurse days; for who is enrolled to bill Medicare in the first place see the changing shape of Medicare enrollment, and for the same concentration lens on other corners of health care, the hospital distress behind rural-access gaps, how Medicare Part D spending concentrates in a handful of drugs, and how industry research dollars concentrate among a few recipients.

Frequently asked questions

How concentrated is nursing-home ownership in the United States?
Heavily. Of the 14,425 skilled nursing facilities in CMS's PECOS All Owners file, 71.9% disclose at least one organization that also owns other facilities, and 52.3% belong to a group of 10 or more. The largest 10% of organizational owners account for 63.1% of all 46,832 facility–owner relationships on file.
What counts as a nursing-home chain in this data?
This study calls a facility chain-affiliated when at least one of its disclosed organizational owners — deduped by CMS owner PAC ID — also appears as an owner of one or more other facilities. It is a structural count of shared ownership, not a brand or a legal definition of a corporate group.
Who are the largest nursing-home owners?
By the number of facilities where they appear as a disclosed owner or operator, the largest organizations include PACS Group and PACS Holdings, The Ensign Group, Life Care Centers of America, and several Genesis HealthCare entities — each named on roughly 180 to 250 facilities. These are organizations, not individuals, and the figure is a count of disclosures, not a judgment about any of them.
Does this study say anything about care quality?
No. It is a structural ownership measure built only from who is disclosed as owning or operating each facility. It draws no inference about staffing, inspection results, penalties, or the quality of care, and naming an organization here is not a statement about its conduct. Quality and enforcement are separate datasets covered in other Fonteum studies.
Why are PACS Group and PACS Holdings listed separately?
Because CMS discloses them under separate owner PAC IDs, and this study deduplicates by PAC ID rather than guessing which entities share a parent. Related entities within one corporate family — operating companies, property companies, and holding companies — therefore appear as distinct rows. That means true family-level concentration is at least as high as the per-organization figures shown, not lower.
How many nursing homes are truly independent?
About 28.1% — 4,056 of 14,425 facilities. Of those, 2,232 (15.5%) disclose no organizational owner at all and are owned and run by individuals or families, while 1,824 (12.6%) disclose a single organization that is tied to no other facility. The remaining 71.9% are part of a multi-facility group.
What ownership roles does the study count?
Direct and indirect ownership interests of 5% or greater, other direct and indirect ownership interests, general and limited partnership interests, and operational or managerial control. It deliberately excludes Additional Disclosable Parties such as accounting firms and banks, mortgage and security-interest holders, corporate officers and directors, managing employees, and trustees — parties CMS discloses but that do not own or operate the facility.
Can I reproduce these figures?
Yes. Every number is a direct count over the public snf_all_owners and snf_enrollments tables — CMS's PECOS SNF All Owners file, snapshot dated 2026-05-25 — with no modeling. The exact SQL for the chain split, the group-size distribution, the top-decile concentration, and the layering depth is published in the reproducibility block below.

Who uses this data

The source data behind this study is public

Compliance teams, journalists, and researchers work from the same federal source families cited above — queried by NPI or facility identifier through Fonteum’s open dataset pages and API. Every figure traces to a frozen, downloadable snapshot you can reproduce yourself.

Browse CMS PECOS→Query the API →How we built this →

Datasets used

CMS PECOS→

Reproducibility

Every claim, reproducible

The SQL+
nursing-home-ownership-concentration-2026.sql
-- Who owns America's nursing homes — and how concentrated that ownership is.
-- Fully reproducible query.
--
-- Question: across the skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in CMS's PECOS "SNF
-- All Owners" disclosure file, how many are tied to a multi-facility
-- ORGANIZATION (a chain/group) versus owned by a single-facility entity or by
-- individuals, and how concentrated is the organizational ownership? The lead
-- figure: of 14,425 SNF enrollments, only 4,056 (28.1%) are independent — owned
-- by individuals or by an organization that appears on no other facility — while
-- 10,369 (71.9%) disclose at least one organization that also owns other
-- facilities, and 7,547 (52.3%) belong to a group of 10 or more facilities.
--
-- This is a STRUCTURAL ownership measure only. It counts disclosed ownership
-- and operational-control relationships. It is NOT a quality, fraud, conduct,
-- or risk signal of any kind, and no individual person is named.
--
-- Sources:
--   public.snf_all_owners — CMS PECOS "Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners"
--     file. One row per owner per SNF enrollment. 280,207 rows; snapshot
--     2026-05-25. associate_id_owner is the canonical owner identifier (PAC ID)
--     — chains are deduped by PAC ID, NOT by name.
--   public.snf_enrollments — companion PECOS "SNF Enrollments" file. One row per
--     SNF enrollment (14,425). enrollment_id is the join key to snf_all_owners.
--   Both: CMS PECOS SNF All Owners, https://data.cms.gov/provider-characteristics/
--     hospitals-and-other-facilities/skilled-nursing-facility-all-owners
--     Public, read-only. License: US-Government-Works (17 U.S.C. Sec. 105).
--     Authorizing statute: ACA Section 6101; 42 CFR Sec. 424.516; CMS-855A.
--
-- Owner roles used as ORGANIZATIONAL OWNERSHIP / OPERATIONAL CONTROL throughout:
--   34 = 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
--   35 = 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
--   85 = DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
--   86 = INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
--   43 = OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
--   38 = GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
--   39 = LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
-- DELIBERATELY EXCLUDED: role 72 (ADP — Additional Disclosable Party, e.g.
--   accounting firms, banks, consultants), 36/37 (mortgage/security interest =
--   lenders), 40/41 (corporate officer/director), 42/25/63 (managing employees,
--   governing body), 71 (trustee). Those parties are disclosed but are not
--   owners or operators of the facility.

-- ============================================================================
-- (1) Universe reconciliation — the two PECOS files at a glance.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
  (SELECT count(*) FROM public.snf_enrollments)                                AS snf_enrollments,
  (SELECT count(*) FROM public.snf_all_owners)                                 AS owner_rows,
  (SELECT count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) FROM public.snf_all_owners
     WHERE type_owner = 'O')                                                   AS distinct_org_pac_ids,
  (SELECT count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) FROM public.snf_all_owners
     WHERE type_owner = 'I')                                                   AS distinct_individual_pac_ids,
  (SELECT max(snapshot_date) FROM public.snf_all_owners)                       AS snapshot;
--  snf_enrollments 14,425 · owner_rows 280,207 · distinct_org_pac_ids 26,453
--  distinct_individual_pac_ids 58,866 · snapshot 2026-05-25

-- ============================================================================
-- (2) HEADLINE: chain vs independent. For each SNF, find the largest "reach"
--     (number of facilities owned) of any of its organizational owners, then
--     classify the facility. Independents = facilities with no organizational
--     owner (individually/family owned) or whose only org owner appears on that
--     one facility. Chain-affiliated = an org owner that also owns >=1 other SNF.
-- ============================================================================
WITH org_owner AS (
  SELECT DISTINCT associate_id_owner, enrollment_id
  FROM public.snf_all_owners
  WHERE type_owner = 'O'
    AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
),
reach AS (  -- how many facilities each organizational owner touches
  SELECT associate_id_owner, count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) AS r
  FROM org_owner GROUP BY associate_id_owner
),
fac AS (    -- per facility: the largest reach among its organizational owners
  SELECT oo.enrollment_id, max(rr.r) AS mr
  FROM org_owner oo JOIN reach rr USING (associate_id_owner)
  GROUP BY oo.enrollment_id
),
allf AS (   -- every enrollment, NULL mr = no organizational owner disclosed
  SELECT e.enrollment_id, f.mr
  FROM public.snf_enrollments e LEFT JOIN fac f USING (enrollment_id)
)
SELECT
  count(*)                                                          AS total_snfs,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 2)                                   AS chain_affiliated,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 2) / count(*), 1)      AS chain_pct,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 10)                                  AS in_group_10plus,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 10) / count(*), 1)     AS group_10plus_pct,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr IS NULL OR mr = 1)                      AS independent,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr IS NULL OR mr = 1) / count(*), 1) AS independent_pct
FROM allf;
--  total_snfs 14,425 · chain_affiliated 10,369 (71.9%) · in_group_10plus 7,547 (52.3%)
--  independent 4,056 (28.1%)

-- ============================================================================
-- (3) HERO: the group-size distribution. Every SNF bucketed by the size of the
--     largest facility-group any of its organizational owners belongs to.
-- ============================================================================
WITH org_owner AS (
  SELECT DISTINCT associate_id_owner, enrollment_id
  FROM public.snf_all_owners
  WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
),
reach AS (SELECT associate_id_owner, count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) r FROM org_owner GROUP BY 1),
fac AS (SELECT oo.enrollment_id, max(rr.r) mr FROM org_owner oo JOIN reach rr USING (associate_id_owner) GROUP BY 1),
allf AS (SELECT e.enrollment_id, f.mr FROM public.snf_enrollments e LEFT JOIN fac f USING (enrollment_id))
SELECT
  CASE WHEN mr IS NULL          THEN '0 individually/family owned'
       WHEN mr = 1              THEN '1 single-facility org'
       WHEN mr BETWEEN 2 AND 9  THEN '2-9 facilities'
       WHEN mr BETWEEN 10 AND 49 THEN '10-49 facilities'
       WHEN mr BETWEEN 50 AND 99 THEN '50-99 facilities'
       ELSE '100+ facilities' END                                  AS group_size,
  count(*)                                                          AS snfs,
  round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1)               AS pct
FROM allf
GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY min(coalesce(mr, -1));
--  0 individually/family owned   2,232  15.5%
--  1 single-facility org         1,824  12.6%
--  2-9 facilities                2,822  19.6%
--  10-49 facilities              4,648  32.2%
--  50-99 facilities              1,807  12.5%
--  100+ facilities               1,092   7.6%

-- ============================================================================
-- (4) The concentration tail. Rank every organizational owner by reach and take
--     the top decile. The largest 10% of owner organizations account for the
--     majority of all facility-owner relationships on file.
-- ============================================================================
WITH org_owner AS (
  SELECT DISTINCT associate_id_owner, enrollment_id
  FROM public.snf_all_owners
  WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
),
reach AS (SELECT associate_id_owner, count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) r FROM org_owner GROUP BY 1),
ranked AS (SELECT associate_id_owner, r, ntile(10) OVER (ORDER BY r DESC) decile FROM reach)
SELECT
  count(*)                                                          AS owner_orgs,
  sum(r)                                                            AS facility_owner_links,
  sum(r) FILTER (WHERE decile = 1)                                  AS top_decile_links,
  round(100.0 * sum(r) FILTER (WHERE decile = 1) / sum(r), 1)       AS top_decile_pct,
  min(r) FILTER (WHERE decile = 1)                                  AS top_decile_floor_reach,
  max(r)                                                            AS max_reach
FROM ranked;
--  owner_orgs 12,646 · facility_owner_links 46,832 · top_decile_links 29,550
--  top_decile_pct 63.1% · top_decile_floor_reach 7 · max_reach 249

-- ============================================================================
-- (5) The largest disclosed organizations, deduped by canonical PAC ID. Column
--     is "SNF enrollments where the organization appears as an owner/operator."
--     NOTE: related entities within one corporate family are disclosed under
--     SEPARATE PAC IDs and so list separately — e.g. PACS Group, Inc. and PACS
--     Holdings, LLC; the several Genesis HealthCare operating entities. This is
--     a count of disclosed organizations, NOT resolved beneficial owners; true
--     family-level concentration is therefore AT LEAST what is shown here. No
--     quality, conduct, or risk inference attaches to any organization listed.
-- ============================================================================
WITH org_owner AS (
  SELECT associate_id_owner AS pac, enrollment_id,
         nullif(trim(organization_name_owner), '') AS nm
  FROM public.snf_all_owners
  WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
),
nm AS (  -- representative display name per PAC ID (most frequent non-blank name)
  SELECT pac, nm, row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY pac ORDER BY count(*) DESC) rn
  FROM org_owner WHERE nm IS NOT NULL GROUP BY pac, nm
)
SELECT n.nm AS owner_org, o.pac AS pac_id,
       count(DISTINCT o.enrollment_id) AS snf_enrollments
FROM org_owner o JOIN nm n ON n.pac = o.pac AND n.rn = 1
GROUP BY n.nm, o.pac
ORDER BY snf_enrollments DESC
LIMIT 12;
--  PACS Holdings, LLC             6103289202  249
--  PACS Group, Inc.               7911360011  248
--  The Ensign Group Inc           3476460494  233
--  Life Care Centers Of America   6608783543  194
--  HCCF Management Group XI LLC    1456511880  187
--  Gen Operations II LLC          2769671536  186
--  ZAC Properties XI LLC          7911167341  186
--  Gen Operations I LLC           1759570526  185
--  Genesis Healthcare LLC         6305035171  184
--  Genesis Healthcare Inc         7810077864  183
--  Providence Group NH, LLC       5294198396  178
--  Sun Healthcare Group Inc       6507774304  177

-- ============================================================================
-- (6) Ownership is layered, not flat. How many DISTINCT organizational owners
--     each facility discloses across direct + indirect + operational layers.
-- ============================================================================
WITH oo AS (
  SELECT enrollment_id, count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) AS n_org_owners
  FROM public.snf_all_owners
  WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
  GROUP BY enrollment_id
)
SELECT
  count(*)                                                          AS facilities_with_org_owner,
  round(avg(n_org_owners), 1)                                       AS mean_org_owners,
  percentile_cont(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY n_org_owners)         AS median_org_owners,
  max(n_org_owners)                                                 AS max_org_owners
FROM oo;
--  facilities_with_org_owner 12,193 · mean_org_owners 3.8 · median_org_owners 2
--  max_org_owners 99

-- ============================================================================
-- (7) The independent minority, characterized. Of the 2,232 SNFs with NO
--     organizational owner disclosed, what roles ARE disclosed? They are owned
--     and run by individuals — confirming these are genuinely independent, not
--     a data gap.
-- ============================================================================
WITH has_org AS (
  SELECT DISTINCT enrollment_id FROM public.snf_all_owners
  WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39')
)
SELECT o.type_owner, o.role_text_owner,
       count(DISTINCT o.enrollment_id) AS facilities
FROM public.snf_all_owners o
WHERE o.enrollment_id NOT IN (SELECT enrollment_id FROM has_org)
GROUP BY o.type_owner, o.role_text_owner
ORDER BY facilities DESC
LIMIT 6;
--  I · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL          1,464
--  I · CORPORATE OFFICER                       1,371
--  I · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST 1,289
--  I · CORPORATE DIRECTOR                      1,110
--  I · W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE                    1,052
--  I · ADP OF THE SNF                          1,018
The snapshot+
dataset_idcms-pecos
snapshot_date2026-05-25
sha256
doi10.5072/fonteum/nursing-home-ownership-concentration-2026
slsa_provenance_url
The JOINs+
universe: snf_enrollments, one row per SNF enrollment                                  -- 14,425 enrollments, snapshot 2026-05-25
organizational owner = snf_all_owners type_owner='O' AND role_code IN (34,35,85,86,43,38,39) -- ownership + operational-control roles; ADP/lenders/officers excluded
owner reach = count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) per associate_id_owner (PAC ID, not name)   -- chains deduped by canonical owner PAC ID
facility class = max owner reach: NULL/1 = independent, >=2 = chain-affiliated           -- independent 4,056 (28.1%), chain 10,369 (71.9%)
group-size buckets over max owner reach                                                 -- 10+ group = 7,547 (52.3%); 100+ = 1,092 (7.6%)
concentration: ntile(10) over owner reach                                               -- top decile = 63.1% of 46,832 facility–owner links; max reach 249
layering = count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) per enrollment                            -- mean 3.8, median 2, max 99 organizations per facility
The pipeline version+
git_sha
slsa_provenance
methodology_versioncms-snf-all-owners/v1

Reproduce this

Run the exact query against the frozen 2026-05-25.

-- Who owns America's nursing homes — and how concentrated that ownership is. -- Fully reproducible query. -- -- Question: across the skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in CMS's PECOS "SNF -- All Owners" disclosure file, how many are tied to a multi-facility -- ORGANIZATION (a chain/group) versus owned by a single-facility entity or by -- individuals, and how concentrated is the organizational ownership? The lead -- figure: of 14,425 SNF enrollments, only 4,056 (28.1%) are independent — owned -- by individuals or by an organization that appears on no other facility — while -- 10,369 (71.9%) disclose at least one organization that also owns other -- facilities, and 7,547 (52.3%) belong to a group of 10 or more facilities. -- -- This is a STRUCTURAL ownership measure only. It counts disclosed ownership -- and operational-control relationships. It is NOT a quality, fraud, conduct, -- or risk signal of any kind, and no individual person is named. -- -- Sources: -- public.snf_all_owners — CMS PECOS "Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners" -- file. One row per owner per SNF enrollment. 280,207 rows; snapshot -- 2026-05-25. associate_id_owner is the canonical owner identifier (PAC ID) -- — chains are deduped by PAC ID, NOT by name. -- public.snf_enrollments — companion PECOS "SNF Enrollments" file. One row per -- SNF enrollment (14,425). enrollment_id is the join key to snf_all_owners. -- Both: CMS PECOS SNF All Owners, https://data.cms.gov/provider-characteristics/ -- hospitals-and-other-facilities/skilled-nursing-facility-all-owners -- Public, read-only. License: US-Government-Works (17 U.S.C. Sec. 105). -- Authorizing statute: ACA Section 6101; 42 CFR Sec. 424.516; CMS-855A. -- -- Owner roles used as ORGANIZATIONAL OWNERSHIP / OPERATIONAL CONTROL throughout: -- 34 = 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST -- 35 = 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST -- 85 = DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST -- 86 = INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST -- 43 = OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL -- 38 = GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST -- 39 = LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST -- DELIBERATELY EXCLUDED: role 72 (ADP — Additional Disclosable Party, e.g. -- accounting firms, banks, consultants), 36/37 (mortgage/security interest = -- lenders), 40/41 (corporate officer/director), 42/25/63 (managing employees, -- governing body), 71 (trustee). Those parties are disclosed but are not -- owners or operators of the facility. -- ============================================================================ -- (1) Universe reconciliation — the two PECOS files at a glance. -- ============================================================================ SELECT (SELECT count(*) FROM public.snf_enrollments) AS snf_enrollments, (SELECT count(*) FROM public.snf_all_owners) AS owner_rows, (SELECT count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) FROM public.snf_all_owners WHERE type_owner = 'O') AS distinct_org_pac_ids, (SELECT count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) FROM public.snf_all_owners WHERE type_owner = 'I') AS distinct_individual_pac_ids, (SELECT max(snapshot_date) FROM public.snf_all_owners) AS snapshot; -- snf_enrollments 14,425 · owner_rows 280,207 · distinct_org_pac_ids 26,453 -- distinct_individual_pac_ids 58,866 · snapshot 2026-05-25 -- ============================================================================ -- (2) HEADLINE: chain vs independent. For each SNF, find the largest "reach" -- (number of facilities owned) of any of its organizational owners, then -- classify the facility. Independents = facilities with no organizational -- owner (individually/family owned) or whose only org owner appears on that -- one facility. Chain-affiliated = an org owner that also owns >=1 other SNF. -- ============================================================================ WITH org_owner AS ( SELECT DISTINCT associate_id_owner, enrollment_id FROM public.snf_all_owners WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39') ), reach AS ( -- how many facilities each organizational owner touches SELECT associate_id_owner, count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) AS r FROM org_owner GROUP BY associate_id_owner ), fac AS ( -- per facility: the largest reach among its organizational owners SELECT oo.enrollment_id, max(rr.r) AS mr FROM org_owner oo JOIN reach rr USING (associate_id_owner) GROUP BY oo.enrollment_id ), allf AS ( -- every enrollment, NULL mr = no organizational owner disclosed SELECT e.enrollment_id, f.mr FROM public.snf_enrollments e LEFT JOIN fac f USING (enrollment_id) ) SELECT count(*) AS total_snfs, count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 2) AS chain_affiliated, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 2) / count(*), 1) AS chain_pct, count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 10) AS in_group_10plus, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr >= 10) / count(*), 1) AS group_10plus_pct, count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr IS NULL OR mr = 1) AS independent, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE mr IS NULL OR mr = 1) / count(*), 1) AS independent_pct FROM allf; -- total_snfs 14,425 · chain_affiliated 10,369 (71.9%) · in_group_10plus 7,547 (52.3%) -- independent 4,056 (28.1%) -- ============================================================================ -- (3) HERO: the group-size distribution. Every SNF bucketed by the size of the -- largest facility-group any of its organizational owners belongs to. -- ============================================================================ WITH org_owner AS ( SELECT DISTINCT associate_id_owner, enrollment_id FROM public.snf_all_owners WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39') ), reach AS (SELECT associate_id_owner, count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) r FROM org_owner GROUP BY 1), fac AS (SELECT oo.enrollment_id, max(rr.r) mr FROM org_owner oo JOIN reach rr USING (associate_id_owner) GROUP BY 1), allf AS (SELECT e.enrollment_id, f.mr FROM public.snf_enrollments e LEFT JOIN fac f USING (enrollment_id)) SELECT CASE WHEN mr IS NULL THEN '0 individually/family owned' WHEN mr = 1 THEN '1 single-facility org' WHEN mr BETWEEN 2 AND 9 THEN '2-9 facilities' WHEN mr BETWEEN 10 AND 49 THEN '10-49 facilities' WHEN mr BETWEEN 50 AND 99 THEN '50-99 facilities' ELSE '100+ facilities' END AS group_size, count(*) AS snfs, round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct FROM allf GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY min(coalesce(mr, -1)); -- 0 individually/family owned 2,232 15.5% -- 1 single-facility org 1,824 12.6% -- 2-9 facilities 2,822 19.6% -- 10-49 facilities 4,648 32.2% -- 50-99 facilities 1,807 12.5% -- 100+ facilities 1,092 7.6% -- ============================================================================ -- (4) The concentration tail. Rank every organizational owner by reach and take -- the top decile. The largest 10% of owner organizations account for the -- majority of all facility-owner relationships on file. -- ============================================================================ WITH org_owner AS ( SELECT DISTINCT associate_id_owner, enrollment_id FROM public.snf_all_owners WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39') ), reach AS (SELECT associate_id_owner, count(DISTINCT enrollment_id) r FROM org_owner GROUP BY 1), ranked AS (SELECT associate_id_owner, r, ntile(10) OVER (ORDER BY r DESC) decile FROM reach) SELECT count(*) AS owner_orgs, sum(r) AS facility_owner_links, sum(r) FILTER (WHERE decile = 1) AS top_decile_links, round(100.0 * sum(r) FILTER (WHERE decile = 1) / sum(r), 1) AS top_decile_pct, min(r) FILTER (WHERE decile = 1) AS top_decile_floor_reach, max(r) AS max_reach FROM ranked; -- owner_orgs 12,646 · facility_owner_links 46,832 · top_decile_links 29,550 -- top_decile_pct 63.1% · top_decile_floor_reach 7 · max_reach 249 -- ============================================================================ -- (5) The largest disclosed organizations, deduped by canonical PAC ID. Column -- is "SNF enrollments where the organization appears as an owner/operator." -- NOTE: related entities within one corporate family are disclosed under -- SEPARATE PAC IDs and so list separately — e.g. PACS Group, Inc. and PACS -- Holdings, LLC; the several Genesis HealthCare operating entities. This is -- a count of disclosed organizations, NOT resolved beneficial owners; true -- family-level concentration is therefore AT LEAST what is shown here. No -- quality, conduct, or risk inference attaches to any organization listed. -- ============================================================================ WITH org_owner AS ( SELECT associate_id_owner AS pac, enrollment_id, nullif(trim(organization_name_owner), '') AS nm FROM public.snf_all_owners WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39') ), nm AS ( -- representative display name per PAC ID (most frequent non-blank name) SELECT pac, nm, row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY pac ORDER BY count(*) DESC) rn FROM org_owner WHERE nm IS NOT NULL GROUP BY pac, nm ) SELECT n.nm AS owner_org, o.pac AS pac_id, count(DISTINCT o.enrollment_id) AS snf_enrollments FROM org_owner o JOIN nm n ON n.pac = o.pac AND n.rn = 1 GROUP BY n.nm, o.pac ORDER BY snf_enrollments DESC LIMIT 12; -- PACS Holdings, LLC 6103289202 249 -- PACS Group, Inc. 7911360011 248 -- The Ensign Group Inc 3476460494 233 -- Life Care Centers Of America 6608783543 194 -- HCCF Management Group XI LLC 1456511880 187 -- Gen Operations II LLC 2769671536 186 -- ZAC Properties XI LLC 7911167341 186 -- Gen Operations I LLC 1759570526 185 -- Genesis Healthcare LLC 6305035171 184 -- Genesis Healthcare Inc 7810077864 183 -- Providence Group NH, LLC 5294198396 178 -- Sun Healthcare Group Inc 6507774304 177 -- ============================================================================ -- (6) Ownership is layered, not flat. How many DISTINCT organizational owners -- each facility discloses across direct + indirect + operational layers. -- ============================================================================ WITH oo AS ( SELECT enrollment_id, count(DISTINCT associate_id_owner) AS n_org_owners FROM public.snf_all_owners WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39') GROUP BY enrollment_id ) SELECT count(*) AS facilities_with_org_owner, round(avg(n_org_owners), 1) AS mean_org_owners, percentile_cont(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY n_org_owners) AS median_org_owners, max(n_org_owners) AS max_org_owners FROM oo; -- facilities_with_org_owner 12,193 · mean_org_owners 3.8 · median_org_owners 2 -- max_org_owners 99 -- ============================================================================ -- (7) The independent minority, characterized. Of the 2,232 SNFs with NO -- organizational owner disclosed, what roles ARE disclosed? They are owned -- and run by individuals — confirming these are genuinely independent, not -- a data gap. -- ============================================================================ WITH has_org AS ( SELECT DISTINCT enrollment_id FROM public.snf_all_owners WHERE type_owner = 'O' AND role_code_owner IN ('34','35','85','86','43','38','39') ) SELECT o.type_owner, o.role_text_owner, count(DISTINCT o.enrollment_id) AS facilities FROM public.snf_all_owners o WHERE o.enrollment_id NOT IN (SELECT enrollment_id FROM has_org) GROUP BY o.type_owner, o.role_text_owner ORDER BY facilities DESC LIMIT 6; -- I · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL 1,464 -- I · CORPORATE OFFICER 1,371 -- I · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST 1,289 -- I · CORPORATE DIRECTOR 1,110 -- I · W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE 1,052 -- I · ADP OF THE SNF 1,018

Cite this study

Citation-ready for researchers and AI.

Fonteum Research Bureau (2026). Who owns America's nursing homes: a concentration story, 2026. CMS PECOS, snapshot 2026-05-25. https://fonteum.com/research/nursing-home-ownership-concentration-2026

Check the chain

Each figure is snapshot-attested — re-derive the hash from the federal file.

1
Snapshot
cms-pecos · 2026-05-25
2
Field hash
SHA-256 a3f1c9…7e6b
3
Signed
Ed25519 · verifiable
✓ Chain signed · check it in Attest →

Related studies

  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Where nursing-home penalties concentrate: a repeat-citation story, 2026Between May 2023 and April 2026, CMS imposed $459.3M in civil money penalties and 2,513 payment denials on 6,884 nursing facilities. Enforcement concentrates: the 53.7% of penalized facilities cited more than once carry 80.1% of the fine dollars and 90.6% of the payment denials — the half cited once drew a fifth of the money.
  • WORKFORCE · JUN 2026Zero-RN days: how often US nursing homes ran a day with no registered nurse on the floorIn the CMS Payroll-Based Journal's 2025 Q2 snapshot, 5.86% of nursing-home facility-days with residents present recorded zero registered-nurse direct-care hours — 77,542 days across 5,062 facilities. The rate ranged from 27.9% in Louisiana to 0.2% in Rhode Island. Days before the federal staffing floor was rescinded, this is the baseline the country now keeps.
  • WORKFORCE · JUN 2026Who is enrolled in Medicare? The nurse practitioner is now the most common clinician413,539 nurse practitioner enrollments make NPs the single most common clinician type in Medicare's provider-enrollment file — 13.9% of all 2.98 million PECOS records, nearly triple the largest physician specialty. Together, NPs and physician assistants are one in five enrollments. Advanced-practice providers now anchor the Medicare workforce.
  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Rural hospital closures, by the numbers: which hospitals are most at riskRural Critical Access Hospitals — the small facilities at the center of the closure crisis — run a 50.4% financial-distress rate, against 39.2% for urban hospitals, across 6,019 Medicare hospitals in the federal HCRIS cost reports. Their average operating margin is −8.93%, and 682 are losing money on patient care.
  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026The few drugs that drive most of Medicare's Part D bill, 2023Medicare Part D paid $275.9 billion for 3,598 drugs in 2023. The 100 costliest — just 2.8% of the list — account for $176.2 billion, 63.8% of the bill. Ten drugs alone are a quarter of it, and 61.5% of priced drugs cost more per dose than a year earlier.

Federal source citations

  1. [1]CMS PECOS · snapshot 2026-05-25 · federal source family · US-Government-Works
Dataset catalog →Source registry →Methodology →Chain integrity →All research →Provider lookup →

Fonteum Research · June 16, 2026 · All figures trace to the frozen federal-data snapshot cited above.

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
65reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→